IPB
MORE @ COMIC RELATED: NEWS COLUMNS REVIEWS PODCASTS BLOGS

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
what makes a movie british or not?
Chaz
post Apr 29 2011, 04:17 PM
Post #1


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 54
Joined: 10-February 11
Member No.: 19,759



Okay I admit King Ralph is not really an english movie even though it takes place there and most of the actors are british. So then i wonder what makes a movie british or not? is it the director? or the writers? Like paul it was directed by an american but written by two brits and it came out In england before it came out here. Or another example the upcoming movie thor is directed by Kenneth Branagh and i'm sure its written by americans and yet like paul it comes out in the uk first.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spaced4SimonPegg
post Apr 29 2011, 07:57 PM
Post #2


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 220
Joined: 9-October 10
Member No.: 19,582



To me is that everything is British director, writers, location and at times subject matter. John Landis filmed American Werewolf in London in England and used an all British crew because they were cheaper than shooting in American. I don't consider AWIL a British movie. But, Landis also directed Burke and Hare in England and used an all British crew and the subject matter was of a British nature. So, I consider Burke and Hare a British movie. I don't consider Paul a British movie even though it was written by 2 Brits it was filmed in the US. But, Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz are British movies to me.

I am sure my explanation makes no sense to normal people laugh.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tim Tilley
post Apr 29 2011, 08:14 PM
Post #3


Freelance Writer and Colorist!
***

Group: Members
Posts: 3,404
Joined: 5-February 09
From: Zanesville, Ohio, U.S.A.
Member No.: 2,926



It makes sense to me because those are also my thoughts. For me it's only British if the entire cast and crew (including everyone from pre production to post) are English. If even one person in the cast, or "main" crew is NOT from the UK, then I don't consider it to be truly British. Then again, there are exceptions, as an example even though there were some Americans involved with the Lord Of The Rings trilogy, I still consider those films to be of New Zealand origin.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_cougar18_*
post Apr 30 2011, 05:51 PM
Post #4





Guests






QUOTE (Tim Tilley @ Apr 29 2011, 07:14 PM) *
It makes sense to me because those are also my thoughts. For me it's only British if the entire cast and crew (including everyone from pre production to post) are English. If even one person in the cast, or "main" crew is NOT from the UK, then I don't consider it to be truly British. Then again, there are exceptions, as an example even though there were some Americans involved with the Lord Of The Rings trilogy, I still consider those films to be of New Zealand origin.


Subject matter also figures into it too. I mean, FRom Hell, for me, is as American as apple pie (the movie, not the book) because the central cast is nearly all american, as are the screenwriters and directors. Yet the film deals with the Jack the Ripper killings. On the other hand, Hammer Horror movies dealt with the same subject matter, while using a British cast and director. The latter films are definitely british.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 04:51 PM