kuzu
Apr 11 2008, 09:59 PM
whats up Gang, i found out about this about 2 hours ago and we've got to bull together and put a stop to it or where all going to be looking for a new line of work.
Orphan Works Bill
it's a bill being "fast tracked" to make it legal for big Stock Image Websites to steal art, illustrations, family photos, anything hosted on US based servers.
How? well the long and short is, we don't have $4500 bucks to Trademark each of our images that we have up on the internet which is what this bill is all about.
I've been spreading the word about this all night and i'm dog ass tired.
you can read some well worded 411 about this here More Info Link it's got all the important links to whats going on.
Anthony Hochrein
Apr 12 2008, 02:10 PM
Thanks for the concern and making other artists aware of it. One of the biggest problems of our internet age is the fact that Artists of all types are being exploited out of their work by all sorts of piracy, and its been harder and harder to guard against it. Here's another link to the GRAPHIC ARTISTS GUILD which will give you more info:
Graphic Artists Guild
Anthony Hochrein
Apr 12 2008, 02:43 PM
BTW, I'm listening to the interview right now, this is typical of the type of Marxist thinking that we pay our kids to learn in college.
Anthony Hochrein
Apr 12 2008, 02:55 PM
This is Napster in favor of millionaires!! We'd better get our sorry butts off of the couch and start talking!!
Anthony Hochrein
Apr 12 2008, 03:44 PM
I'll never use Google again, either. BTW, anything Google related is coming off of my computers right now. Too late? I really don't care. It's a shame that Bill Gates is behind this, too. What do you expect, this looks like a serious move towards a Marxist corporate control over EVERYTHING.
The Leader
Apr 12 2008, 03:47 PM
Okay.... well millionaires getting their way...that's not really news....
what can we do? I mean that seriously, not facetiously. One of the articles was entitled "Time to Act", but that was from 2006.
How $)#(*ed are we and what can we do NOW?
kuzu
Apr 12 2008, 03:56 PM
several things have come to light about this through out the day today, that had the "panic button" not been pressed might not have been brought up.
1. this version of the bill might not see the light of day, because of how one sided it is.
2. this is the second bill of it's type in the last few years to rear it's ugly head. the first one was voted down in 2006.
3. after talking to someone who's being following it for a few months, he expressed that this bill would not negate current copyright laws. so if your an artist and you've got the work in print before it's up on the net, should this bill pass, your print copyright would hold up in court.
4. this bill is being presented as a way to smooth out unclear areas of internet copyright laws, it's still one sided and a very real threat even though it doesn't have a number or is not on the docket for 2008. that doesn't mean it could not be reworded and combined with a bill already on the docket for this year.
5. bill 1959 was scoffed at late last year, bill 1959 is a bill to stop "home grown terrorists" however how it reads is it will allow the government to control what content we can put on the internet, websites and blogs. as of the 7th of April 2008 it's still moving forward and has allot of support. so bill 1959 is mostlikely going to be a reality.
do not take the Orphan Works Bill lightly, Internet Copyright reform is going to happen at some point very soon, like it or not. if we the artist, don't voice our concerns and let the big companies trying to push through bills similar to this know we are watch...
we are going to be in very big trouble.
kuzu
Apr 12 2008, 04:02 PM
Leader: contact you state congress person and senators that the first step, let them know that this proposed bill is wrong and only benefits big business.
this will also let them know that whatever bill on this topic that is pushed through needs to work in the favor of the little guy, NOT Bill Gates and big business.
The Leader
Apr 12 2008, 04:07 PM
Thanks Kuzu!
I'm going to get started on doing that and encourage everyone to do the same and spread the word!
Anthony Hochrein
Apr 12 2008, 04:19 PM
We're already in trouble. Apathy is the emotion of the decade. One of our biggest problems is that, the world has turned into a place where you can literally get something for nothing, which is why I'm so against just downloading ANYTHING I want from Torrent sites. Once upon a time, if you couldn't get something, you were not meant to have it. Piracy has gone global, thanks to computer technology, and lack of principles. Millionaires have always gotten their way as a matter of circumstance, but this is something different. And the fact that Bill Gates and Google's team is putting so much money into this is nothing more than a power ploy, and most of us are dumbly passing through purchasing new computers and gadgets and giving them all the power that they need. Take a look at the television situation of next year and how we all need an "upgrade" to digital television or a box for our current tv to receive the new digital signal. I really don't believe for a minute that we need all of this stuff. It's just big government coming to swallow all of us up. And I'm not only pointing the finger at U.S.
Really, which one of us really needs to be so "connected" that we're paying through the nose for worthless gadgets like cell phones that connect us to the internet and more tv and more music than we could ever hear in our lifetime?
Wow, I hope I don't start a heated argument here.
kuzu
Apr 12 2008, 04:19 PM
Great if you get something together maybe post it up so folks can copy it, that would help get things moving. again there is little chance the Orphan Works Bill will see the light of day in it's current form.
However something very similar WILL and it's not going to work in our favor regardless. Unless the government knows we're paying attention then it's going to work in the favor of people like Bill Gates and that can not happen.
Anthony Hochrein
Apr 12 2008, 04:22 PM
("kuzuSkot":1vgyth0l)
Leader: contact you state congress person and senators that the first step, let them know that this proposed bill is wrong and only benefits big business.
this will also let them know that whatever bill on this topic that is pushed through needs to work in the favor of the little guy, NOT Bill Gates and big business.
The problem is that we're being advised not to start writing just yet because no one's going to listen yet. We should get on these email lists right now and get the word out to as many people as possible to watch. I just changed my home page to Ask.com. I'm not using Google anymore. PERIOD. Screw that. From now on it's going to be an us against them power play.
kuzu
Apr 12 2008, 04:54 PM
Flairbrusher: your right, and people who don't want to deal with the reality of all this are already trying to present counter point to why "we" don't need to worry. siting the fact that they haven't heard about it on the new or read about it in the paper so it's not really a danger.
the media works for the government and big business, so their not going to, it's not in their best interest. WE have to be the ones to voice this is unexceptable.
it's easy to just sit back and torrent media and screw around all day with gadgets, work our asses off so we can buy **** we don't need and watch our rights slip away.
infact thats what our government is counting on... it's how gas prices have skyrocketed, how 9/11 happened, everything that is wrong in the past 8 years is because we are so worried about stuff that isn't worth our time. Reality TV, HD, Iphones whatever.
part of why this is happening is Bill Gates. He's not the richest man in the anymore. "Vista is dying" microsoft stock is dropping from the failed yahoo buy out.
our country is in deep **** right now, and it's going to drag the rest of the world down in with it unless everyone becomes aware and pulls their heads out of the sand.
kuzu
Apr 12 2008, 05:09 PM
ok, i just got sent a message about a petition start by some folks over on dA (deviant art) Deviants vs Orphan Works Bill so here's something that's movng in the right direction.
kuzu
Apr 12 2008, 05:50 PM
here's a link to a complied list on links on the topic orphan works links
Anthony Hochrein
Apr 12 2008, 06:06 PM
The "Orpaned" works bill Kuzu?
kuzu
Apr 12 2008, 06:11 PM
i didn't start it, and your not the first person to notice that
The Leader
Apr 12 2008, 07:42 PM
("Flairbrusher":zkz91kgp)
We're already in trouble. Apathy is the emotion of the decade.
That's why I always tell the young that you can think what you want about hippies, but they got stuff done because they weren't afraid to keep complaining when they thought things were WRONG.
kuzu
Apr 12 2008, 07:45 PM
ok, last message on this, because i couldn't delete this posting or edit it.
it appears I've been fooled as have many other folks across the internet as to the true purpose of this Orphans Bill and what it's really trying to do. i've provide a link to someone who's much smarter than me who will break it down, i'm sorry for whipping you guys into a frenzy and raising your blood pressure.
maradydd.livejournal.com
this happened because even though i've been researching it for about 24 hours with lack of sleep, certain terms where miss understood because I'm just stupid i guess, and so is about 5000 other people at least.
Anthony Hochrein
Apr 12 2008, 08:32 PM
Well, I think that it's better to get up in arms about such a thing, since, as I stated earlier, the world has become a pretty cold "take it now, whether you paid for it or not" place, thanks to internet technology. As it is, when you post anything online, you risk someone just ripping it off anywhere in the world, for example, what is to stop someone in China from stealing an image one of us has made, and printing it on a ton of Chinese product, used only in China? Will anyone here know about it? Noooo!! Will anyone here really be able to do anything about it? Noooo!! And so, you risk. But for the government to let something like this really happen- is it beyond the realm of possibility? Of course not! And with the current hatred of Capitalism (well, it's good if the haters are profiting, but a bad bad thing for everyone else- let's go back to the age of Socialism in Russia) Typical of the pot calling the kettle black.
It's good for us to keep our eyes open anyway, as we need to be business people. There still is an abundance of people that want something for nothing. And there are still an abundance of artists out there who are too afraid to defend themselves, or price their work.
Boy, did you get my ire up. I guess my boycott of Google is over now. Unless, of course they are still pushing millions of dollars into this idea.
kuzu
Apr 12 2008, 08:39 PM
yeah, i felt that something wasn't right from the word go about all this last night. However i thought it better to post something and be wrong then not post anything and get screwed in the long run.
i had done allot of research before posting anything here, but theres no protection from yourself if you walk into something and already have a perception that is not correct in the first place.
again sorry to whip everyone into a frenzy about nothing.
Anthony Hochrein
Apr 12 2008, 09:41 PM
I feel so whipped...
The Leader
Apr 13 2008, 10:32 AM
Whew... I'm just so relieved... the saddest part about all this is that we live in a world where this is completely plausible.
kuzu
Apr 13 2008, 10:47 AM
that's the conclusion I've come to, we live in a country with a corrupt government that we can't trust to do their job correctly so those of us that are not lawmakers have to keep an eye on them.
on of the Laws i've been siting as an example of how easy out government gets laws passed under our noses is Amber Alert. Which is a good Law and should have been passed, no problem. However a very bad bill was Paperclipped to the Amber Alert Bill and got turned into law without anyone knowing until it was way to late.
How does that happen? well congress people and the senators are very lazy and often do not read what they are signing. the Orphans Work Bill or anything like it could be reworded and paper clipped to something that would pass without question.
that was the main reason i was so quick to jump on this. it's easy for them to get bad bills turned into laws and why we need to keep an eye on what's going on.
Anthony Hochrein
Apr 13 2008, 12:50 PM
Well, unfortunately it always comes down to the bottom line, and that means that lots of things get passed and swept under the rug. Look at how many products from China were recalled last year! Products targeted at our kids!! One right after the other! Of course, the U.S. could care less any more! We pay 5 cents for something manufactured over there for something the corporation will make heavy profit from! Then we cry when product is bad! Of course, we are still ordering product from China- it's "too expensive" for an American to build... we've got to pay our IT people to manage our Ethernets.
Anthony Hochrein
Apr 13 2008, 01:00 PM
BTW, I know a guy across the hall from me that smokes weed all the time. He could give a crap about who else has to smell it, whether or not there are kids or old folks that are affected. I have no compassion for that behavior, about the same compassion that I have for someone who gets drunk on liquor around kids and old folks. Medicinal my butt. Must be for his yellow eyes.
Just my opinion concerning that RAVE law.
kuzu
Apr 13 2008, 05:09 PM
your missing the point of that bill and why it's bad. in the case of the guy down the hall, if the landlord had no idea it was going on, the police would throw your land lord in jail.
if you had a party, and someone brought over a girl and she was all messed up, but nobody knew, the cops get called because of noise. they decide to search everyone. they find drugs in her purse, you and your landlord would go to jail.
that's why it's bad.
kuzu
Apr 13 2008, 05:34 PM
i meant, "could" go to jail. the way that law read, before they amended it, people who owned property or had their name on a lease were held responsible if "drugs" are found on the property.
that link talks about (or it usta) a girl who was thrown in jail, who had no knowledge of drug use on her property. if that had not happened, the law would never have been amended.
as far as medical use, yes it has great value, i don't know about the guy down the hall. However, i have bad arthritis in my drawing hand (too many fist fights as a kid). I nolonger smoke weed for medicinal reasons or at all for that matter and product less work as a result of my arthritis. so i speak from experiance as to the benifit of it. i'm also the only person in my family, EVER that doesn't wear glasses, and that's not because i eat carrots.
your right that's your opinion, but its wrong and as a result of that to many people in this county live in pain. personally i choice not to take pills for my arthritis, because i don't have the money for medical insurance, and pain medication is far more addictive.
that is a fact.
Anthony Hochrein
Apr 13 2008, 06:27 PM
Advil?I know that's true if you're talking about Codine.
Anthony Hochrein
Apr 13 2008, 06:33 PM
BTW, well, that WOULD be bad, wouldn't it? particularly now that I'm a board member in a coop full of people that don't like to take any action.
Anthony Hochrein
Apr 13 2008, 06:41 PM
BTW, don't get me started with that. I've got art to do.
kuzu
Apr 14 2008, 07:13 AM
this isn't the right board to be discussing medical or medicinal drugs.
too many people have no clue what they are talking about when it comes to that topic and just parrot what TV, the media, other people, websites tells them. Most people quick to voice and opinion have ZERO first hand knowledge.
"doing get me started, i've got art to do", give me a break:rofl:
Anthony Hochrein
Apr 14 2008, 12:54 PM
("kuzuSkot":2knhms0w)
this isn't the right board to be discussing medical or medicinal drugs.
too many people have no clue what they are talking about when it comes to that topic and just parrot what TV, the media, other people, websites tells them. Most people quick to voice and opinion have ZERO first hand knowledge.
"doing get me started, i've got art to do", give me a break:rofl:
Don't get me started, I've got art to do, and I've lived around enough drunks and drug addicts to argue the point.
kuzu
Apr 14 2008, 04:55 PM
just because someone can argue a point doesn't make them right... or wrong, all it means is they can argue, not discuss or learn.
Anthony Hochrein
Apr 14 2008, 06:04 PM
Well, how can I argue with that logic? I'll try not to take that statement personally. At this point, let's just agree to disagree.
Anthony Hochrein
Apr 14 2008, 06:13 PM
Besides, I've learned that since one can be safely nested across the country behind one's computer, it's easy to dish out insults. Personally, my mind is not open to the Misinformation superhighway. It eventually would become a sewer.
Psychomud
Apr 14 2008, 08:39 PM
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.